Skip to content
ChainringClub

The Best Gravel Bike Tyres

Seven tyres, ranked. We haven't ridden any of them — instead we've quoted what each seller publishes, cited what a lab measured, and flagged every place the two disagree.

A gravel bike on a loose fire road, front wheel and knobbed tyre in the foreground.
By Stephen V.Published July 17, 2026How we research

Heads up: we earn a commission if you buy through the links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never decides what makes the list — here’s how that works.

Quick picks

Tap any row for the full write-up. Specs are the manufacturer's own published claims, read on 17 July 2026.

#ProductBest forPrice
1
Panaracer GravelKing SK

Panaracer GravelKing SK

The knobbed tyre that posts a smoother tyre's rolling resistance in the one dataset that publishes any.

Top pick
Loose, rough gravel
2
Continental Terra Trail

Continental Terra Trail

The only listing here that publishes what its casing protection and compound are called.

Mixed tarmac and gravel
3
WTB Byway

WTB Byway

A 44mm tyre sold for pavement — and the one tyre here nobody has independently measured.

Pavement-heavy riding
4
Teravail Cannonball

Teravail Cannonball

The Durable casing, at a width the lab didn't test in a casing the lab didn't test.

Loaded bikepacking
5
Maxxis Rambler

Maxxis Rambler

EXO sidewalls and a published compound — attached to the slowest EXO figure BRR printed.

Sharp rock and sidewall cuts
6
WTB Riddler

WTB Riddler

The fastest-feeling premise here, undone by the worst puncture score BRR had ever recorded.

Dry, smooth, fast gravel
7
Schwalbe G-One Allround

Schwalbe G-One Allround

The one to skip — the listing won't tell you how wide the tyre is.

Nothing on this list

Three things decide a gravel tyre: how much tread it has, how fast it rolls, and how hard it is to puncture. You cannot max all three. Tread costs watts, thin fast casings cost punctures, and puncture armour costs both watts and money. Every tyre on this page is a different answer to the same three-way trade, and the marketing on all seven listings is written to make you forget that a trade is happening at all.

We have not ridden any of them. What follows is what the sellers publish, what one lab measured, and — the part nobody else does — where those two things are about different tyres.

The lab data in this category is real, and it has a commercial relationship

Almost every rolling-resistance figure you will see quoted for a gravel tyre traces back to Bicycle Rolling Resistance, which runs tyres on a drum at a stated 29 km/h under a stated 42.5 kg load, punctures them on a purpose-built rig, and measures the mounted dimensions with micrometers. It is the only systematic public dataset in this category and this page leans on it heavily.

Bicycle Rolling Resistance also sells a confidential test service to tyre manufacturers. We checked rather than assumed: its own About page states that it offers a confidential test service and has provided tyre test data to tyre manufacturers. That is not an accusation — selling lab time is a normal way to fund a lab, and it is arguably how the public results get paid for. But a lab with paying manufacturer clients is not a disinterested party, and you are entitled to know that before you weigh its numbers. The publishers who rank above us for this query cite BRR as independent. It is rigorous and it is public. It is not disinterested.

One more thing about BRR that matters more than the conflict: most of its per-pressure numbers are behind a paid tier.Of the six tyres here it has tested, we could read a complete per-pressure breakdown for none of them. The figures in the table below are the ones BRR publishes free, and they were not all taken at the same pressure — the Riddler’s is at 40 psi, the Rambler’s at 50 psi, the GravelKing SK’s at 45. That makes the column indicative, not a clean like-for-like. We could have hidden that and printed a tidy ranking. It would have been a fake tidy ranking.

Every one of these tyres is narrower than the number on the sidewall

This is the most useful thing on the page and it took a table to see. Across all six tyres BRR measured, the measured casing width came in below the labelled width — every single time. The GravelKing SK labelled 40 measured 37. The G-One labelled 40 measured 36. The Cannonball labelled 42 measured 38. The Rambler labelled 40 measured 39 and was the closest to honest in the group.

That is not six manufacturers lying. It is ISO 5775 working as designed: the first number in 40-622 is a nominalsection width, and the standard explicitly ties realised width to the rim it’s mounted on — it specifies that rim inner width should be around 55% of nominal width for tyres over 30mm. Mount the same tyre on a wider rim and it measures wider. BRR’s bench uses one rim, so its deltas are BRR’s deltas, not universal law. The direction, though, is consistent, and the practical lesson survives: if you need 40mm of air, buying a tyre labelled 40 is optimistic. We’ve pulled the whole mess apart in the gravel tyre width guide.

Tread costs less speed than you think, and width costs almost none

The received wisdom is that knobs are slow and wide is slow. The published evidence is messier and more interesting than that.

On tread: the GravelKing SK has knobs and posted the fastest free BRR figure here. The Byway has a centre slick and has never been measured. If knobs were straightforwardly slow, the rank order would not look like this.

On width: Rene Herse’s published roll-down testing compared 28, 32, 35 and 44mm tyres in the same casing on a 132-metre hill and found the differences between them were not statistically significant — 44mm tyres were not slower than 28s, even at 29 km/h. The mechanism is that a narrow tyre at high pressure trades low hysteresis loss for high suspension loss, and a wide tyre at low pressure does the reverse, and the two roughly cancel. Rene Herse manufactures and sells the tyres in that test, which we mention for the same reason we mentioned it about BRR: they tested their own product and won. Read the method and decide for yourself — it’s published, which is more than most marketing claims manage.

Where width genuinely costs you is clearance and weight, not watts. Which is why the real constraint on this purchase is your frame, not your legs.

What each listing actually publishes

Not what we measured — we measured nothing. This is what the seller prints on the listing, read on 17 July 2026. The empty cells are the story: not one of these seven listings publishes a weight, and not one publishes a TPI count.

TyrePublished sizeTubeless stated?Named casing / compoundWeightTPI
Panaracer GravelKing SK700 x 45YesNot publishedNot published
Continental Terra Trail700 x 40YesShieldWall / PureGripNot publishedNot published
WTB Byway700 x 44YesNot publishedNot published
Teravail Cannonball700 x 38YesDurable / Fast CompoundNot publishedNot published
Maxxis Rambler700 x 38CYesEXO / Dual CompoundNot publishedNot published
WTB Riddler700 x 37YesNot publishedNot published
Schwalbe G-One AllroundNot publishedNoNot publishedNot published

Read off each product’s own Amazon listing on 17 July 2026. Schwalbe’s listing gives “28/27.5 inches”, which is a wheel diameter, not a tyre width — so the size cell is genuinely blank rather than awkward.

What a lab measured — for the size it bought

These are Bicycle Rolling Resistance’s published figures, and the “size tested” column is the important one— it is frequently not the size on the listing we link. Where it differs, the number does not transfer, and we’ve said so on the pick.

Variant BRR testedSize testedSame as listing?Measured widthMeasured weightRolling res.Puncture (tread)
GravelKing SK TLC40-622No — listing is 4537 mm404 g20.9 W @ 45 psi28 pts
Terra Trail TR40-622Yes37 mm452 g22.2 W35 pts
Riddler TCS Light37-622Yes35 mm446 g22.8 W @ 40 psi24 pts
Cannonball Light & Supple42-622No — listing is Durable 3838 mm530 g23.9 W33 pts
Rambler EXO/TR 120 TPI40-622No — listing is 3839 mm420 g25.0 W @ 50 psi28 pts
G-One Allround Super Ground40-622Unknown — listing has no size36 mm524 g26.0 W35 pts
WTB BywayNot tested

Source: Bicycle Rolling Resistance, retrieved 17 July 2026. Tests are run at a stated 29 km/h under a stated 42.5 kg load. The watt figures were not all taken at the same pressure — BRR publishes most per-pressure data only to paying members, so these are the free figures and the pressures differ where shown. Treat the column as indicative, not as a league table. What this table deliberately does not show is a score. We did not test these tyres; a score would be a measurement we did not take.

The picks, in detail

1

Panaracer GravelKing SK

Top pick
Panaracer GravelKing SK
$39.92 · View on Amazon

Price as of Jul 17, 2026. #ad

Best for: Loose, rough gravel

The knobbed tyre that posts a smoother tyre's rolling resistance in the one dataset that publishes any.

  • 700 x 45 (seller)
  • Tubeless (seller)
  • Folding (seller)
  • Cranberry/Black

Here is the honest case, and it is entirely second-hand. Bicycle Rolling Resistance measured the GravelKing SK in 40-622 at 20.9 watts (Crr 0.00626) at 45 psi, on its 29 km/h, 42.5 kg test rig. That was the quickest number in the group of six we could read without paying, and it came from a tyre with actual knobs on it — which is not how the tread-versus-speed trade-off is supposed to go. That result is why it leads this page.

What that result is not: a measurement of the tyre on this listing. BRR bought a 40. Amazon is selling a 45. Panaracer does not publish a rolling resistance figure for either, and we are not going to interpolate one for you.

Good

  • The widest published size in this field at 700 x 45 — more air is the cheapest comfort there is
  • In the 40mm version, the fastest rolling resistance figure we could read publicly in this field, despite having knobs
  • The listing publishes size, bead type and tubeless status — which sounds like a low bar until you read the Schwalbe listing

Less good

  • The listing publishes no weight, no TPI and no pressure range
  • 45mm needs frame clearance you may not have — measure before you buy
  • The lab figure below is for the 40mm; nobody has published a number for the 45 on this listing

Skip it if: Your frame won't take 45mm, or you ride mostly tarmac. A knobbed 45 on a road commute is a lot of tyre doing a job a 37 would do more happily — and you'd feel the knobs long before you felt the grip.

2

Continental Terra Trail

Continental Terra Trail
$50.68 · View on Amazon

$59.95 15%

Price as of Jul 17, 2026. #ad

Best for: Mixed tarmac and gravel

The only listing here that publishes what its casing protection and compound are called.

  • 700x40 (seller)
  • Tubeless (seller)
  • ShieldWall (seller)
  • PureGrip (seller)
  • E25 e-bike rated (seller)

Good

  • Publishes a named sidewall protection (ShieldWall) and compound (PureGrip) rather than leaving both blank
  • The only tyre here with a published e-bike rating (E25) — relevant if the bike is heavier than a bike
  • Tied for the best tread puncture score in the BRR figures we could read, at 35 points

Less good

  • BRR measured the 40 at 22.2 watts — mid-pack, and 1.3 watts off the GravelKing SK
  • "PureGrip" and "ShieldWall" are names, not specifications; Continental doesn't publish what either changes
  • No published weight or TPI on the listing

Skip it if: You want the widest tyre your frame will take. At a published 700x40 this is the middle of the road in a field that runs to 45, and if your bike has the clearance you're leaving comfort on the table.

3

WTB Byway

WTB Byway
$37.51 · View on Amazon

Price as of Jul 17, 2026. #ad

Best for: Pavement-heavy riding

A 44mm tyre sold for pavement — and the one tyre here nobody has independently measured.

  • 700 x 44 (seller)
  • Tubeless (seller)
  • Folding (seller)
  • Black

Good

  • 700 x 44 published — the second-widest here, so you get the volume without the aggressive tread
  • WTB positions it explicitly for pavement and bikepacking, which is an unusually honest bit of listing copy
  • 44mm of published width with a pavement-biased tread is a rare combination — most tyres this wide arrive with knobs you don't need on tarmac

Less good

  • We could not find a Bicycle Rolling Resistance test for the Byway at all — so it is the one pick here with no third-party number of any kind
  • The listing publishes no weight, no TPI, no pressure range
  • A centre slick is the wrong tool the moment the surface turns properly loose

Skip it if: You ride genuinely loose or wet gravel. This is a road tyre that has made peace with dirt, not a gravel tyre. If your rides are more dirt than tarmac, the GravelKing SK is the same idea with grip.

4

Teravail Cannonball

Teravail Cannonball
$36.50 · View on Amazon

Price as of Jul 17, 2026. #ad

Best for: Loaded bikepacking

The Durable casing, at a width the lab didn't test in a casing the lab didn't test.

  • 700 x 38 (seller)
  • Tubeless (seller)
  • Durable (seller)
  • Fast Compound (seller)
  • Tan

Good

  • Teravail publishes its casing choice by name on the listing — "Durable" — which is more than most here do
  • A loaded bike punishes sidewalls, and casing is the variable that decides sidewall survival
  • Tan wall, if you care, and enough people do that it's worth saying

Less good

  • BRR tested the Light & Supple 42, not the Durable 38 — different casing AND different size, so its 23.9 W and 530 g do not transfer here
  • BRR called sidewall puncture resistance the potential deal-breaker on the casing it did test
  • 700 x 38 is narrow for a bikepacking tyre in a field that offers 44 and 45

Skip it if: You want the lab data to mean something. This is the pick where the published test is furthest from the product on the listing — a different casing in a different width. If that gap bothers you, it should; buy the Terra Trail instead.

5

Maxxis Rambler

Maxxis Rambler
$51.81 · View on Amazon

$65.00 20%

Price as of Jul 17, 2026. #ad

Best for: Sharp rock and sidewall cuts

EXO sidewalls and a published compound — attached to the slowest EXO figure BRR printed.

  • 700x38C (seller)
  • Tubeless (seller)
  • Dual Compound (seller)
  • EXO (seller)

Good

  • EXO is Maxxis's named sidewall protection and it's published right on the listing
  • Dual Compound is likewise published rather than implied
  • BRR measured the 40 at 420 g — the lightest measured weight in the six we could read

Less good

  • BRR measured the EXO/TR 120 TPI 40 at 25.0 watts (Crr 0.00749) at 50 psi — second-slowest of the six
  • Its tread puncture score of 28 points is joint-lowest with the GravelKing SK, which is odd for a tyre sold on protection
  • BRR's own summary of the tyre it tested was that it "doesn't impress"

Skip it if: You're chasing speed. On the published lab evidence this is the slow end of the field, and the puncture score doesn't buy back what the watts cost. It earns its place on sidewalls and sharp rock, not on the flat.

6

WTB Riddler

WTB Riddler
$40.57 · View on Amazon

Price as of Jul 17, 2026. #ad

Best for: Dry, smooth, fast gravel

The fastest-feeling premise here, undone by the worst puncture score BRR had ever recorded.

  • 700 x 37 (seller)
  • Tubeless (seller)
  • Folding (seller)
  • Black

Good

  • 700 x 37 published — the narrowest here, which is the right answer if your gravel is hardpack
  • BRR measured the TCS Light 37 at 22.8 watts at 40 psi, which is respectable
  • WTB's "light and fast rolling" claim is at least the claim the tyre is built around

Less good

  • BRR scored the tread at 24 points and said the Riddler took the lowest tread AND sidewall puncture scores of all CX/gravel tyres it had tested at that point
  • 37mm is not much air when the surface gets rough
  • The listing publishes no weight and no TPI

Skip it if: You get punctures. That sounds glib, so here's the specific version: the one published, independent puncture dataset in this category rates this tyre last, in both tread and sidewall. If you ride flint, thorns or sharp rock, buy almost anything else on this page.

7

Schwalbe G-One Allround

Schwalbe G-One Allround
$45.48 · View on Amazon

Price as of Jul 17, 2026. #ad

Best for: Nothing on this list

The one to skip — the listing won't tell you how wide the tyre is.

  • 28/27.5 inches (seller)
  • E-Bike Ready (seller)
  • Width in mm: not published
  • Tubeless: not stated on listing

Good

  • The G-One Allround is a genuinely well-regarded tread pattern — this is not a bad tyre
  • Schwalbe publishes real specs for it elsewhere; the problem is this listing, not the product

Less good

  • "28/27.5 inches" is a wheel diameter, not a width. The listing publishes no mm width at all
  • Schwalbe sells the G-One Allround in several widths and multiple casings, so the listing describes a family, not a product
  • The listing doesn't state tubeless in the title, in a category where every rival does
  • In the one casing/size BRR tested — Super Ground SpeedGrip 40 — it measured 26.0 watts and 524 g: the slowest and heaviest of the six figures we could read

Skip it if: Honestly: buy something else, and this is our skip-this pick. Not because the tyre is bad — it isn't — but because we cannot tell you what arrives. A gravel tyre listing that publishes no width is selling you a surprise, and the whole point of a 45 versus a 37 is that it is not a surprise. If you want a G-One, buy it somewhere that prints the ETRTO number.

What actually decides this purchase

Your frame decides this, not your legs. Every tyre here is between 37 and 45mm published, and the useful half of that range may be unavailable to you. A road frame that takes 32 makes this entire page academic. Measure the gap at your chainstays and fork crown before you read another word of tyre marketing — gravel bike vs road bike covers what clearance actually differs by, and it is the real difference between the two categories.

Then buy 2 to 4mm wider than you think.Because of the ISO nominal-width business above, every tyre BRR measured came in under its label on BRR’s rim. If you want 40mm of air and your frame takes exactly 40mm, you have no margin for the tyre that arrives wider than BRR’s bench suggests — or for the mud that fills the gap. Buy the clearance, not the number.

Puncture protection is the spec nobody publishes and everybody needs.Not one listing here publishes a TPI count or a protection rating. The only public numbers are BRR’s puncture scores, and they range from 24 points to 35 — a spread of nearly 50% across tyres that all look the same in a product photo. If you ride flint or thorns, that spread matters more than every watt on this page combined.

Tubeless is assumed, and it costs more than the tyre. Six of these seven listings say tubeless. That is a system, not a feature: it needs sealant, a rim that takes it, and a way to seat a bead. Budget for that before you budget for the tyre — tubeless vs tubes is the honest version of that maths, and how to fix a flat covers what happens when the sealant loses.

Pressure will change the tyre more than the tyre will.BRR’s own free figures span 40 to 50 psi across these tests, and that alone is worth watts. Getting pressure right is free; buying a faster tyre is not. Start with the tyre pressure guide.

Common questions

What width gravel tyre should I actually buy?

The widest your frame clears, minus 4mm of margin for mud and for the fact that tyres arrive wider on wide rims. On the published evidence, width costs you almost nothing in speed — Rene Herse’s roll-down tests found 44mm tyres were not statistically slower than 28s in the same casing — so the old “narrow is fast” instinct is mostly folklore. What width does cost you is clearance. Check the frame first; the tyre is the easy part.

Are knobby gravel tyres slower than slicks?

Less than you would expect. The fastest free rolling-resistance figure in this field belongs to the Panaracer GravelKing SK, which has knobs, at 20.9 watts in BRR’s 40mm test. The slowest belongs to the Schwalbe G-One Allround Super Ground at 26.0 watts, which has a far less aggressive tread. Casing and compound appear to matter at least as much as tread depth. That said, all six of those numbers were taken at pressures that differ, so treat the gap as indicative rather than exact.

Do I need tubeless gravel tyres?

Six of the seven listings here state tubeless, so the category has largely decided for you. The honest case for it on gravel is that you can run lower pressure without pinch flats, and low pressure is where wide tyres actually pay off. The honest case against is that it is a system with running costs — sealant dries out, and a bead that won’t seat at the roadside is a genuinely worse day than a tube. We’ve laid out both in tubeless vs tubes.

Why is my new tyre narrower than the size printed on it?

Because the printed number is nominal, not measured. Under ISO 5775 the width in 40-622is a nominal section width, and the standard ties realised width to rim inner width. Every one of the six tyres on this page that Bicycle Rolling Resistance measured came in narrower than its label on BRR’s rim — by 1 to 4mm. On a wider rim the same tyre measures wider. Nobody is cheating; the number just isn’t a promise.

Which of these tyres do you actually run?

None. We haven’t ridden any of them, and we’re not going to imply otherwise to make this page feel more authoritative. What we have done is read every listing, pull every published figure a third party has measured, name that third party’s commercial relationship with tyre manufacturers, and flag every case where the tested tyre is not the tyre on the listing. If a recommendation needs us to say “it felt fast”, it isn’t a recommendation.

Sources

We haven’t ridden or tested any of the products on this page, and we don’t pretend otherwise. Read how we research — or tell us we’re wrong and we’ll log the correction.